← Search

Stephen Heinzelman

— year-end
64 matches · 20W–44L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Stephen Heinzelman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history64 matches
W
2025-10-04 · Federer Was Betterer · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tomas Reese
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2025-09-27 · Federer Was Betterer · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vimal Seshadri Raguraman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W
2025-08-02 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-07-02 · Western: Lords of the String · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-06-23 · Western: Lords of the String · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-05-12 · Western: Lords of the String · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Griffin Bond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
Mathieu Barthelemy / Helen Titus
2025-03-29 · Crandall · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Virginia Crandall mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
L
2024-11-02 · Cameron/Pruner · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rajesh Barnabas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2024-10-19 · Cameron/Pruner · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mathieu Barthelemy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2024-06-12 · Western: Cameron/Pruner · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christopher Cameron
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2024-06-03 · Western: Cameron/Pruner · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2024-05-29 · Western: Cameron/Pruner · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
Teams19 teams · 2020–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
52.6%
10W–9L · 54.9% of games
4.5
17.4%
4W–19L · 39.6% of games
8.0mixed
12.5%
1W–7L · 43.2% of games
9.0mixed
33.3%
4W–8L · 41.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
10 matches
#1 Singles
6%
4 matches
#2 Singles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert