← Search

Virginia Crandall

Rochester, NY
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
151 matches · 78W–73L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Virginia Crandall to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history151 matches
L
2026-08-11 · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Rachel Herrmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-03 · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Rachel Herrmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-07-20 · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Rachel Herrmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-13 · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Rachel Herrmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-16 · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with MAGGIE REILLY
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
N/A
2026-02-15 · Double Trouble · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Tran mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-01-04 · #1 Doubles · with Nicole McKee championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-01-04 · #1 Doubles · with Nicole McKee championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2025-11-23 · Crandall/Reilly · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nicole McKee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
N/A
2025-11-23 · Crandall/Reilly · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Maya Clinard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-11-22 · Double Trouble · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Aarne Lees mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-11-08 · Crandall/Reilly · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with MAGGIE REILLY
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
52.8%
19W–17L · 53.7% of games
4.0
57.9%
11W–8L · 54.3% of games
4.5
42.9%
15W–20L · 51.3% of games
0.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 50.7% of games
8.0mixed
77.3%
17W–5L · 57.7% of games
9.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
60 matches
#1 Female Doubles
23%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
24 matches
#2 Female Doubles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal