← Search

Cliff Bundick

Rochester, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
144 matches · 87W–57L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Cliff Bundick to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history144 matches
W
2026-07-13 · Serve Bots · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kyle Sherry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-07-08 · Serve Bots · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kyle Sherry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-08 · Serve Bots · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Zablonski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-27 · Serve Bots · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kyle Sherry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-05-18 · Serve Bots · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kyle Sherry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-01-10 · The Net Mafia · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Zhimin Huo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
Joseph Hommel / Harsh Patel
2026-01-04 · #2 Doubles · with Nam Danh championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-01-04 · #2 Doubles · with Kirill Kobyakov championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2025-11-22 · The Net Mafia · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Blaire Davis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2025-11-15 · ROC: Served · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eugene Kobyakov
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-10-25 · ROC: Served · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeffrey Tankel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2025-10-12 · ROC: Served · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kirill Kobyakov
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
45.8%
11W–13L · 49.3% of games
4.0
69.4%
50W–22L · 57.4% of games
4.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 60.9% of games
7.0mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 55.5% of games
8.0mixed
42.1%
8W–11L · 50.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
63 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
30 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova