← Search

Pamela Steinhauser

— year-end
107 matches · 59W–48L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Pamela Steinhauser to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history107 matches
L
2026-07-13 · NEO/Mazzola/A55&Over9.0W · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Nancy Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-06 · NEO/Mazzola/A55&Over9.0W · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sara Stehlik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-07-22 · A55 9.0W KI Mazzola · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Katy Hirst Lucci
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-07-17 · A40 4.0W 4 AVB Hendricks · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brenda Kekel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-07-08 · A55 9.0W KI Mazzola · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Traci Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-06-17 · A55 9.0W KI Mazzola · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Katy Hirst Lucci
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-06-03 · A55 9.0W KI Mazzola · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Patricia Hirsch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2025-05-15 · A40 4.0W 4 AVB Hendricks · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dina Hopps
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-02-14 · TRI 3.0W AVB Kerosky · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Camilla Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-02-08 · TRI 3.0W AVB Kerosky · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Aey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2025-01-12 · TRI 3.0W AVB Kerosky · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Aey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
Lynne Belko / Lori Rausch
2024-07-31 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jane Moose
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
Teams21 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
59.1%
13W–9L · 54.3% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
57.1%
8W–6L · 51.7% of games
8.0
71.4%
20W–8L · 58.3% of games
8.5
50%
11W–11L · 50.4% of games
9.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 40.2% of games
8.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 45.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
26 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal