← Search

Andrew Humphreys

Newtown, PA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
32 matches · 22W–10L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Andrew Humphreys to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history32 matches
W
2026-06-20 · Frosty Hollow Hurricanes · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lance Shaffer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-13 · Frosty Hollow Hurricanes · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Onkar Singh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-06 · Frosty Hollow Hurricanes · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lance Shaffer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-06-28 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Olson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-06-21 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Evan Mcgowan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
2025-06-14 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashish Patel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-06-14 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Perron
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-06-13 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Olson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
W
2024-06-29 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Russo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
Weibing Ding
2024-06-22 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
Jeremy Rothman / Philip Belotserkovsky
2024-06-15 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dave Leno
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
David Miller / Christopher Sterman
2024-06-15 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Justin Zaslow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
4.0
68.8%
22W–10L · 56% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
6 matches
#2 Singles
9%
3 matches
#1 Singles
6%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe