← Search

Heath Hoover

— year-end
42 matches · 20W–22L · seasons 2019–2022

Captains: add Heath Hoover to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history42 matches
W
Luis M Jimenez / Steven Prosperino
2022-07-06 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Gregory Lesser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2022-05-11 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Paul Kissner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2021-11-14 · Club Fit Briarcliff · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Daniel Sandoval
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2021-10-10 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Caroline Dunlop mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2021-10-03 · Club Fit Briarcliff · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Vikram Ravikumar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2021-07-26 · Southern: Chestnut Ridge Racquet Club · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Gregory Vadasdi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L
2021-06-14 · Southern: Chestnut Ridge Racquet Club · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Wojciech Rymarowicz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2021-05-24 · Southern: Chestnut Ridge Racquet Club · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mark Leeds
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2021-05-17 · Southern: Chestnut Ridge Racquet Club · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Paul Kissner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2020-03-06 · Club Fit Briarcliff Pros and Cons · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nurit Praeger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2020-02-29 · Club Fit Briarcliff Pros and Cons · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Denise Wenacur mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
L
2020-02-23 · Club Fit Briarcliff Pros and Cons · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa Kitterman-Cohen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
Teams28 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.5
43.8%
7W–9L · 52.4% of games
8.0mixed
48%
12W–13L · 52.8% of games
9.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe