← Search

Kevi Harwood

— year-end
120 matches · 68W–52L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kevi Harwood to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history120 matches
W
2026-07-09 · Fridley/Goldmann · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-04 · Fridley/Goldmann · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Hartnagel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-05-21 · Fridley/Goldmann · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Siebenman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-04-19 · Fridley/Goldmann (S) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-2, 1-0
L
2026-03-22 · Fridley/Goldmann (S) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vikki Moran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-03-08 · Fridley/Goldmann (S) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ellen Hendel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-01-18 · Fridley/Goldmann (S) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-01-04 · Fridely/Goldmann (F) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vikki Moran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-09-21 · Fridely/Goldmann (F) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Beth Crowner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-6, 1-0
W
2025-07-24 · Fridley/Goldmann · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Risley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2025-07-17 · Fridley/Goldmann · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Siebenman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2025-07-10 · Fridley/Goldmann · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Risley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
Teams28 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
57.1%
60W–45L · 53% of games
8.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 48.8% of games
9.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
53 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
31 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe