← Search

Vikki Moran

— year-end
189 matches · 91W–98L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Vikki Moran to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history189 matches
L
2026-09-12 · Glenview- Villages/ Burden · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nancy Radzimski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-25 · Fridley/Goldmann · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
Sue Percy / Jenifer Segal
2026-05-17 · #3 Doubles · with Mary Pat Geldmeier championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-16 · #3 Doubles · with Mary Pat Geldmeier championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-05-03 · Fridley/Goldmann (S) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Pat Geldmeier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-02 · Lahm · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Antoinette Kovar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-25 · Goldmann/Fridley · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Pat Geldmeier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-19 · Fridley/Goldmann (S) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacey Roath
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-18 · Lahm · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Diana Durkee August
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-12 · Fridley/Goldmann (S) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Pat Geldmeier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
L
2026-04-11 · Lahm · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Antoinette Kovar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-03-29 · Fridley/Goldmann (S) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leanne Cantu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
Teams27 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
50%
4W–4L · 46.9% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
50.9%
82W–79L · 51.7% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
36.4%
4W–7L · 43.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 57% of the time
#1 Doubles
57%
107 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
21 matches
#1 Singles
4%
8 matches
#2 Singles
4%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal