← Search

Jennifer Trethaway

Woodstock, GA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
110 matches · 22W–88L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Jennifer Trethaway to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history110 matches
L
2026-07-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Gary
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
Rena Schmit / Kim Miller
2026-07-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diane Rice
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Gary
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
Cindy Klein / Rebekah Caler
2026-07-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wanda Lucas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-30 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natalie Bouchard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maggie McKnight
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
Jennifer Lucas / Tricia Ranson
2026-06-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janet Rosenfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-1, 0-0
L
2026-06-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wanda Lucas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-02 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Gary
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-03-20 · Holly Springs (Jennifer Trethaway)* · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Suzy Fitzgerald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-02-27 · Holly Springs (Jennifer Trethaway)* · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sharon Ausenbaugh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
50%
4W–4L · 51.3% of games
3.5
17.6%
18W–84L · 36.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 56% of the time
#3 Doubles
56%
62 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
27 matches
#4 Doubles
10%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
6%
7 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe