← Search

Louis Parks

Salt Lake City, UT
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
75 matches · 17W–58L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Louis Parks to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history75 matches
L
2026-09-05 · Silver Slicers II · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Leta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-31 · Silver Slicers II · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Leta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-20 · Silver Slicers II · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Timothy Jeffryes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2025-09-19 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Clark Layton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2025-09-17 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Glenn Bailey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-09-10 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Alfred Balch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-09-03 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Raymond Verheydt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-08-25 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Alfred Balch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2023-08-21 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Howard Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2023-08-14 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Howard Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2023-07-17 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Howard Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2023-06-10 · #3 Doubles · with Janice Stokes-Burns championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
10.5%
2W–17L · 34.4% of games
6.0
18.8%
3W–13L · 29% of games
6.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 48.5% of games
7.0mixed
25%
7W–21L · 41.3% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
22 matches
#2 Male Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams