← Search

Donna Newell

Roxboro, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
163 matches · 97W–66L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Donna Newell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history163 matches
L
2026-09-03 · JHagerty.55C-YMCA · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Claire Blackwelder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-02 · JHagerty.65C-YMCA · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Anne Brady
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-08-27 · JHagerty.55C-YMCA · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Leslie Jackson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-08-26 · JHagerty.65C-YMCA · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Araya Coffey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-08-20 · JHagerty.55C-YMCA · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Claire Blackwelder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-23 · NDraughon-YMCA · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Glenn Matsushima mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
W
Linda Roberson / Diana Cox
2026-05-14 · #3 Doubles · with Susana Harvey championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-04-24 · JHagerty-YMCA · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Virginia Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-04-17 · JHagerty-YMCA · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Virginia Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-04-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pamela Schoenfeld
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-04-14 · DAdams-DUR · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susana Harvey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-04-13 · EHoover-YMCA · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eleanor Hoover
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams52 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
63.5%
40W–23L · 54.7% of games
4.0
22.2%
2W–7L · 37.3% of games
6.5
89.7%
26W–3L · 66% of games
7.5
55.2%
16W–13L · 49.4% of games
3.5mixed
0%
0W–5L · 40% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
63 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
52 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
48 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert