← Search

Jane Thrailkill

Chapel Hill, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
94 matches · 45W–49L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Jane Thrailkill to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history94 matches
W
2026-09-10 · LFarber-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Bailey Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-28 · DCorey-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ulrike Foley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-27 · LFarber-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cynthia Kleeberger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-08-21 · DCorey-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tammy Bradley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-20 · LFarber-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sarah Ederle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-24 · VHiguchi-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Corey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-16 · VHiguchi-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Nielsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
Jorgelina Stroud / Stephanie Lee
2026-04-11 · MCP.Adams · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diane Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-03-29 · MCP.Adams · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diane Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-27 · VHiguchi-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynne Farber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-03-20 · VHiguchi-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Regina Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-17 · VHiguchi-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Virginia Higuchi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
47.8%
22W–24L · 49.8% of games
4.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.5
65.2%
15W–8L · 57.4% of games
7.5
47.1%
8W–9L · 49.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
36 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
14 matches
#1 Singles
6%
6 matches
#3 Singles
3%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe