← Search

Pamela Schoenfeld

— year-end
91 matches · 53W–38L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Pamela Schoenfeld to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history91 matches
L
2026-09-11 · MLong.55.7.5C-DUR · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Diane Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-08 · TOC.Hollett · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Laura Caldwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-01 · TOC.Hollett · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Audrey Hollett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-25 · TOC.Hollett · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Wolborsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-08-21 · MLong.55.7.5C-DUR · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Donna Spero
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
Lonnie Sroka / David Kidd
2026-08-13 · CP.Adams · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adam Schoenfeld mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
W
Lonnie Sroka / Pho Le
2026-06-05 · CP.Adams · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rick Kerns mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-05-30 · CP.Adams · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adam Schoenfeld mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
Steven Miller / Mary Parker
2026-05-23 · CP.Adams · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adam Schoenfeld mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donna Newell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
L
2026-04-07 · Je.Komes55A3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacey Stephens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-04-07 · DAdams-DUR · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Millie Hunter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
Teams29 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 72.1% of games
3.5
53.5%
23W–20L · 53.8% of games
6.5
69.2%
9W–4L · 57.6% of games
7.5
0%
0W–4L · 30.4% of games
3.5mixed
50%
5W–5L · 47.9% of games
6.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
37 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
22 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams