← Search

Molly Tracy

Bement, IL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
204 matches · 107W–97L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Molly Tracy to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history204 matches
L
2026-09-02 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Ann Royse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-19 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sarah Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-08-08 · #3 Doubles · with Cindy Crist championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
Michelle Parks / Kim Kuwabara
2026-08-08 · #3 Doubles · with Cindy Crist championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-07 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kay Lindsay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-08-05 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sally Boland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-08-03 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sung Min Moon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-26 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Vinny Mangina mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-26 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lijian Zhang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-07-22 · MSIL A40&O 4.0W Novitsky-Champaign · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jodi Ferguson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-07-19 · MSIL A18&O 4.0W Hoag-Champaign · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Podeschi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-17 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Weldon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams56 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
4.0
55.8%
24W–19L · 54% of games
7.0
69.2%
9W–4L · 53.6% of games
7.5
60%
18W–12L · 54.3% of games
8.0
50%
11W–11L · 50.7% of games
6.5mixed
0%
0W–4L · 45.1% of games
7.0mixed
38.5%
5W–8L · 49.2% of games
7.5mixed
65.2%
15W–8L · 56.8% of games
8.0mixed
44%
11W–14L · 51.6% of games
9.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
72 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
71 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
61 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer