Christine Munteanu
Chicago, IL
208 matches · 104W–104L · seasons 2022–2027
Captains: add Christine Munteanu to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history208 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-2
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams64 teams · 2022–2027
CHI E 18W4.0 4.McF Newson Sat 6 $25
CHI E 40W4.0 1.Tam Lund Sun 1 $25
CHI E 40W4.5 3.Gnbk Ueda Sat 3 $30
NITA E 40W18e Wilmette-Farinas/Nakamura
NITA E 40W40a Wilmette-Jurczyk/Dau
CDTA E 18&OW4.0 3McFet Newson Sat 6 $25
CDTA E M18&O8.0 4RT Burks Sat 2 $27
CDTA S 18&OW4.0 1.Tam Lund Tue 7 $22
CDTA S 40&OW4.0 2.Tam Lund Thu 7 $22
CDTA S 40&OW4.5 1.Gnbk Ueda Sun 1 $30
CDTA S ComboW7.5 3.Gnvw Sangal Mon 7 $21
CDTA S ComboW8.5 2.Wilm Thompson Sun 11 $22
CDTA S ComboX7.5 8.McFet Baltazar Sun 3 $25
CDTA S M40&O8.0 1.Nbk Marberry Tue 7 $28 $28
CDTA S TriWLo 5.RT Ford Sat 2 $27
CDTA S TriWMid 3.Tam Landt Sun 1 $22
CDTA W 18&OW4.0 3.McFet Newson Sat 6 $25
CDTA W 40&OW4.0 5.Tam Lund Sun 1 $22
CDTA W ComboW7.5 1.Gnvw Sangal Sun 5 $21
CDTA W ComboW8.5 1.Wlmt Thompson Sun 11 $22
CDTA W ComboX7.5 7.McFet Baltazar Sat 6 $25
CDTA W ComboX8.5 2.CPW Yang Sat 6 $28
CDTA W M18&O8.0 8.RT Burks Sun 6 $27
CDTA W TriWMid 6.Tam Landt Sat 7 $22
CHI F CW7.5 1.Gnvw Sangal Sun 5 $21
CHI F CW8.5 3.Wilm Thompson Sun 11 $22
CHI F CX7.5 8.Gnvw Baltazar Sat 5 $21
NITA E 40W18a TAM-Jurczyk/Wright
NITA S 40W18e TAM-Jurczyk/Farinas
NITA S 40W40d Wilmette-Jurczyk/Farinas
NITA W 40W18a TAM-Jurczyk/Farinas
NITA W 40W40b Wilmette-Jurczyk/Farinas
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
51.9%
14W–13L · 49.6% of games
4.0
55.4%
46W–37L · 53.8% of games
4.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
100%
6W–0L · 74.2% of games
8.5
35.3%
6W–11L · 45.8% of games
7.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 49.7% of games
7.5mixed
50%
18W–18L · 50.6% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
7W–14L · 42.1% of games
8.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
93 matches
#2 Doubles
43%
89 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
22 matches
#1 Singles
1%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.