← Search

Kishore Chandrasekharan

— year-end
188 matches · 88W–100L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kishore Chandrasekharan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history188 matches
L
Vinayak Behl / Rajiv Sethumadhavan
2026-07-25 · #3 Doubles · with Marc Rothenberg championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-25 · #3 Doubles · with Scott Leiman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-22 · Easier to Run · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Edgar Cala
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-07-20 · Riff Raff · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sunil Sah
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-15 · Easier to Run · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Edgar Cala
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-13 · Spin Doctors · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Will Coston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-09 · Bergen: Aces and Bagels · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Leiman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-06 · Riff Raff · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nischint Manelkar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-02 · Bergen: Aces and Bagels · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Leiman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-29 · Riff Raff · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-26 · Spin Doctors · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-25 · Bergen: Aces and Bagels · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eric Hwang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
Teams41 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
51.5%
53W–50L · 51.5% of games
4.0
29.6%
8W–19L · 44.6% of games
7.5
50%
2W–2L · 47.1% of games
7.0mixed
54.5%
18W–15L · 50.7% of games
7.5mixed
40%
2W–3L · 46.2% of games
8.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 44.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 29% of the time
#2 Doubles
29%
54 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
53 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
38 matches
#1 Singles
13%
25 matches
#2 Singles
5%
10 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams