← Search

Edgar Cala

Paramus, NJ
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
184 matches · 48W–136L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Edgar Cala to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history184 matches
W
2026-07-22 · Easier to Run · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kishore Chandrasekharan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-07-16 · Bergen: Aces and Bagels · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Todd Allievi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-07-15 · Easier to Run · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kishore Chandrasekharan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-13 · Riff Raff · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with George Sheffey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-06 · Riff Raff · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Will Coston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-29 · Spin Doctors · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Junyoung Choi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-26 · Spin Doctors · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Junyoung Choi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-25 · Bergen: Aces and Bagels · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with FLORIS VREEDENBURGH
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-06-24 · Easier to Run · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joshua Peters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-22 · Riff Raff · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bruce Joo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-15 · Riff Raff · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Will Coston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-06-10 · Easier to Run · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Will Coston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
28.1%
25W–64L · 43.6% of games
4.0
7.7%
2W–24L · 35.1% of games
7.0
22.2%
2W–7L · 35.9% of games
7.5
14.3%
2W–12L · 36.3% of games
7.0mixed
32.4%
11W–23L · 43.9% of games
7.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
77 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
50 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
40 matches
#1 Singles
4%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
5 matches
#2 Mixed Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer