← Search

Alice Schadler

Cincinnati, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
43 matches · 31W–12L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Alice Schadler to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history43 matches
W
2026-07-20 · Queen City Black · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathleen Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-14 · Beechmont · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tracy Coleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
Becky Burgbacher / Beatrice Davis
2026-07-13 · Queen City Black · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Fields
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
Becky Burgbacher / Beatrice Davis
2026-06-29 · Queen City Black · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tracey DiFalco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-16 · Beechmont · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tracy Shetty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
Meg Argo / Beatrice Davis
2026-06-01 · Queen City Black · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathleen Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-18 · Queen City Black · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Fields
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
Janet Totin / Anna Huse
2026-03-20 · Beechmont · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Baer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-5
W
2026-03-06 · Beechmont · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenny Price
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-02-13 · Beechmont · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Baer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-01-23 · Beechmont · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Britt Atkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-12-12 · Beechmont · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenny Price
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
63.6%
14W–8L · 58.4% of games
7.0
80%
4W–1L · 62.1% of games
8.0
81.2%
13W–3L · 55.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 47% of the time
#3 Doubles
47%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert