← Search

Perin Goodman

— year-end
42 matches · 22W–20L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Perin Goodman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history42 matches
L
2026-07-27 · Harpers Peyton · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jessica Shafer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-20 · Queen City Ivory · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Ehme
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-13 · Queen City Ivory · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Eberlein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-07-13 · Harpers Peyton · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heather Tash
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-15 · Harpers Peyton · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Harrington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
2026-05-26 · Queen City Silver · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-19 · Queen City Silver · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Tash
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-03-06 · Queen City Chrome · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Eberlein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
Alice Schadler / Britt Atkins
2026-01-23 · Queen City Chrome · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with MacKenzie Hammel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-11-21 · Queen City Chrome · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Judy Dennis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
Phyllis Mendoza / Britt Atkins
2025-11-14 · Queen City Chrome · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Eberlein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2025-10-24 · Queen City Chrome · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chrissy Buckingham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 4-2
Teams12 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
4.0
69.2%
18W–8L · 58.6% of games
4.5
30.8%
4W–9L · 46.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 43% of the time
#3 Doubles
43%
18 matches
#1 Singles
19%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
7 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer