← Search

Meg Argo

— year-end
57 matches · 16W–41L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Meg Argo to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history57 matches
W
2026-07-16 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dwan Foster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Corinne Lehmann / Kathleen Adams
2026-06-29 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Bryce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
Monica Mazzone / Corinne Lehmann
2026-06-22 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Bryce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
Kathleen Adams / Corinne Lehmann
2026-06-15 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christine Douglas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
Missy Horn / Susan Peters
2026-06-08 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristene Ehme
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
Alice Schadler / Kathleen Adams
2026-06-01 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beatrice Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-28 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dwan Foster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-21 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tere West-Arroyo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2024-05-29 · Queen City Teal · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anne McIntosh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2024-05-01 · Queen City Teal · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anne McIntosh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
L
2024-04-24 · Queen City Teal · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Barbara Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2024-04-17 · Queen City Teal · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Sanchez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
Teams11 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
50%
2W–2L · 46.3% of games
4.0
16%
4W–21L · 36.8% of games
7.0
20%
1W–4L · 44.9% of games
8.0
39.1%
9W–14L · 45% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 72% of the time
#3 Doubles
72%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
9%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova