← Search

Victoria Leigh Glesmann

— year-end
85 matches · 38W–47L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Victoria Leigh Glesmann to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history85 matches
L
2026-08-12 · Jorgensen · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cynthia Waldrop
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-20 · NE/Winquest/55&Over8.0W · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kay Merkel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-15 · NE/Winquest/55&Over8.0W · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Lou Winquest
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-05-13 · NE/Winquest/65 and over 8.0W · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Lou Winquest
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-05-06 · NE/Winquest/65 and over 8.0W · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Lou Winquest
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-01-11 · Martin · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Spurgeon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-09-24 · Jorgensen · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tammy Weber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2025-08-20 · Jorgensen · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tammy Weber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-08-13 · Jorgensen · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jo Lehan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 0-6, 0-1
W
2025-07-10 · Martin/Winquest · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tory Jorgensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-06-30 · Martin/Winquest · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Lou Winquest
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-02-23 · Holbrook · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tamara Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Teams28 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 41.9% of games
4.0
53.8%
7W–6L · 53.1% of games
4.5
29.4%
10W–24L · 41.8% of games
8.0
76.5%
13W–4L · 56.6% of games
9.0
60%
3W–2L · 58.1% of games
8.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 44.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
22 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova