← Search

Heather Blumel

Omaha, NE
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
314 matches · 154W–160L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Heather Blumel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history314 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Gradoville · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kay Merkel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-26 · Gradoville · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Flood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-08-12 · Gradoville · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberly Gradoville
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-24 · Never Lost a Tailgate · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeff Fredricks mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-21 · Never Lost a Tailgate · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeff Fredricks mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-30 · Heard · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Flood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-26 · Never Lost a Tailgate · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Daniel Reid mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-23 · Heard · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Gradoville
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-19 · Strawhecker · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jenny Waltemath
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-18 · Strawhecker · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jenny Waltemath
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-16 · Heard · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Flood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-12 · Never Lost a Tailgate · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Diamantis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams67 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
46.2%
6W–7L · 46.4% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
59.5%
50W–34L · 53.4% of games
4.5
38.5%
15W–24L · 43.8% of games
8.0
53.6%
15W–13L · 51.9% of games
9.0
0%
0W–5L · 30.9% of games
8.0mixed
52.2%
59W–54L · 51.5% of games
9.0mixed
29%
9W–22L · 43.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
119 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
108 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
81 matches
#1 Singles
1%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer