← Search

Cynthia Waldrop

ELKHORN, NE
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
148 matches · 89W–59L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Cynthia Waldrop to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history148 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Jorgensen · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beth Stiles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-09-02 · Jorgensen · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jo Lehan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-12 · Jorgensen · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Victoria Leigh Glesmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-16 · NE/Irwin/18&Over4.0W · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Angeline Larson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-09 · NE/Irwin/18&Over4.0W · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Lindner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-05-19 · NE/Irwin/18&Over4.0W · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Seevers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-08 · NE/Irwin/40&Over4.0W · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Seevers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-02-06 · Starsky & Clutch · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Scott Waldrop mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-01-23 · Starsky & Clutch · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Scott Waldrop mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-01-18 · NE/Irwin/40&Over4.0W · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelli Fitzgerald Draper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-01-11 · NE/Irwin/40&Over4.0W · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shannon Churchill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-01-09 · Starsky & Clutch · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Scott Waldrop mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
50%
2W–2L · 42.1% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
69%
40W–18L · 57.1% of games
4.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
75.8%
25W–8L · 59.1% of games
8.5
60%
6W–4L · 50.8% of games
4.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 37.8% of games
8.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 45.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
67 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
30 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe