← Search

Daniel Mandl

Clarksville, MD
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
92 matches · 37W–55L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Daniel Mandl to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history92 matches
L
2026-06-30 · Southerland 65+ 8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark Southerland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-29 · DT Grabill 7.0 65+ · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephen Haines
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-14 · DT Grabill 7.0 55+ · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Sesin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-06-12 · DT Grabill 7.0 55+ · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Furst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-08 · DT Grabill 7.0 65+ · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephen Haines
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-01 · Southerland 65+ 8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Al Zanger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
N/A
2026-05-30 · DT Grabill 7.0 55+ · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Vin Grabill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-28 · DT Grabill 7.0 65+ · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Guy Silas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-14 · DT Grabill 7.0 55+ · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeffrey Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
Trevor Croft / Douglas Smith
2026-05-12 · DT Grabill 7.0 65+ · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephen Palm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-05-03 · DT Grabill 7.0 55+ · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Vince Giuliana
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-08-14 · DT Grabill 65+ 7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Hansberry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
80%
4W–1L · 61.1% of games
4.0
31.8%
7W–15L · 41.5% of games
4.5
25%
2W–6L · 35% of games
7.0
50%
7W–7L · 54.6% of games
8.0
33.3%
8W–16L · 40.7% of games
7.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
46.2%
6W–7L · 47.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 46% of the time
#3 Doubles
46%
42 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
31 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
18 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova