← Search

John Batu

Greenbelt, MD
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
159 matches · 115W–44L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add John Batu to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history159 matches
W
2026-07-26 · 40+ Room 9 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Seung Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-25 · 40+ Room 9 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kevin Gass
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-16 · 40+ Room 9 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paul Song
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-12 · 40+ Room 9 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christopher Tetrault
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-26 · 40+ Room 9 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Peter Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
N/A
2026-06-18 · McKeon - Defenders · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rick Ball
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-12 · McKeon - Defenders · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Seung Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-02 · McKeon - Defenders · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Seung Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-20 · McKeon - Defenders · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Seung Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-17 · McKeon - Defenders · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeffrey Soriano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-14 · McKeon - Defenders · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rick Ball
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
W
2026-05-03 · McKeon - Defenders · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jim Hannan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
70%
28W–12L · 60% of games
3.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 57% of games
5.5
75%
3W–1L · 58.8% of games
6.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 66.5% of games
7.0
76.9%
10W–3L · 56.4% of games
3.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 65.1% of games
3.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
80.5%
33W–8L · 64.1% of games
6.5mixed
50%
4W–4L · 48.1% of games
7.0mixed
77.3%
17W–5L · 58.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
72 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
48 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
37 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova