Al Zanger
Clarksville, MD
38 matches · 14W–24L · seasons 2021–2026
Captains: add Al Zanger to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history38 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L
Michael Kane / Steve Newcomer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
David Watt / William Bloomquist
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
Daniel Mansfield / Kwangsoo Jeon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
N/A
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Michael Kane / Richard Minor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
Samuel Hughes / William Bloomquist
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
75%
6W–2L · 57.7% of games
8.0
26.7%
8W–22L · 43.2% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
10 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.