← Search

Victor Nehf

Lakewood, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
156 matches · 63W–93L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Victor Nehf to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history156 matches
W
2026-08-04 · SS-G ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steven Kugler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-07-28 · SS-G ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Lobascio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-21 · SS-G ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steven Kugler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-07-15 · KC-CC RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-07-07 · SS-G ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steven Kugler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-01 · KC-CC RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Ethridge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-30 · SS-G ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Lobascio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-24 · KC-CC RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Ethridge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-23 · SS-G ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jimmie Rose
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-06-17 · KC-CC RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-06-12 · SS-G GREEN · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gary Murphy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-06-10 · KC-CC RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brent Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
42.6%
23W–31L · 46.9% of games
4.5
10%
2W–18L · 41.9% of games
8.0
60.4%
29W–19L · 53.3% of games
9.0
0%
0W–4L · 37.2% of games
8.0mixed
40%
6W–9L · 45.3% of games
8.5mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 46.7% of games
9.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 17.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
69 matches
#1 Doubles
40%
62 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
20 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert