← Search

Eric Snelgrove

Denver, CO
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
53 matches · 23W–30L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Eric Snelgrove to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history53 matches
L
2026-08-14 · #3 Doubles · with Josh Lozow championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-04 · DTC RED · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Daniel Casey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-01 · #3 Doubles · with Josh Lozow championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-07-28 · DTC RED · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Daniel Casey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-07 · DTC RED · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Charles Kyker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-01 · DTC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tim Fitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-10 · DTC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Falkenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L
2024-07-17 · DTC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephen Olsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2024-07-09 · DTC GREEN · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Carlson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2024-06-29 · DTC YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Janice Jensen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2024-06-26 · DTC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Fawley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2024-06-23 · DTC YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elaine Yang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
43.3%
13W–17L · 46.2% of games
8.0
50%
2W–2L · 51.5% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
50%
6W–6L · 52.9% of games
9.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
14 matches
#1 Singles
4%
2 matches
#2 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer