← Search

Jeremy Erdley

DENVER, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
106 matches · 57W–49L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Jeremy Erdley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history106 matches
L
2026-08-19 · GAC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Hipshman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-12 · GAC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brad Meister
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-05 · GAC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brad Meister
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-29 · GAC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patrick Reed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
Brian Zook / Matt Budler
2026-05-26 · GAC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Keith Ybanez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-22 · GAC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patrick Reed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-05-19 · GAC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bruce Bendell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-15 · GAC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brad Meister
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-12 · GAC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kevin Conley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-05 · GAC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeffrey Tran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
Brian Fitzgerrell / David Nelson
2026-04-28 · GAC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeffrey Tran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-04-25 · GAC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Keith Ybanez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
61.7%
37W–23L · 54.8% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
0%
0W–5L · 23.8% of games
6.0mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 50.8% of games
6.5mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 50.5% of games
7.0mixed
41.2%
7W–10L · 49.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
52 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
15 matches
#1 Singles
7%
7 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams