← Search

Paula Broe

Denver, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
114 matches · 47W–67L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Paula Broe to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history114 matches
L
2026-08-27 · CACM GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Barnhill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-05 · CACM GREEN · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Snider
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-04 · CACM NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathy Bailey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-29 · CACM GREEN · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Bailey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-23 · CACM GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Barnhill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-07-22 · CACM GREEN · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Snider
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-07-21 · CACM NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Judy Tanita
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-09 · CACM RED · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carrie Steuart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-11 · CACM RED · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caren Misky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-10 · CACM GREEN · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Helen Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-30 · CACM GREEN · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Barnhill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-19 · CACM PINK · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Helen Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
46.4%
26W–30L · 48.1% of games
7.0
42.1%
16W–22L · 49.6% of games
8.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 42% of the time
#3 Doubles
42%
48 matches
#2 Doubles
41%
47 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
18 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer