← Search

Carrie Steuart

Denver, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
160 matches · 79W–81L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Carrie Steuart to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history160 matches
W
2026-09-03 · CACM NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Deluccia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-20 · CACM NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Deluccia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-08-06 · CACM NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Deluccia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-04 · CACM GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Deluccia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-07-22 · CACM GREEN · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Bailey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
Ann Hugh / Marcia Whitney
2026-07-15 · CACM GREEN · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Harlow-Irwin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-07-14 · CACM GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Deluccia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-09 · CACM RED · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paula Broe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-08 · CACM GREEN · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathryn Terry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-07 · CACM GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Deluccia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-07-02 · CACM RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Helen Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-30 · CACM GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brenda Flomenhaft
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
77.8%
7W–2L · 64.3% of games
3.5
64.2%
43W–24L · 53.9% of games
4.0
31.2%
15W–33L · 41.6% of games
7.0
23.5%
4W–13L · 44.1% of games
8.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 58.3% of games
7.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 44.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
61 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
42 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
41 matches
#1 Female Singles
6%
9 matches
#1 Singles
3%
4 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe