← Search

Lena Ursten Hobbs

Denver, CO
3.5A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
333 matches · 193W–140L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lena Ursten Hobbs to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history333 matches
W
2026-08-27 · CP RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret Dowling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-23 · WP-C YELLOW · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Eyal Tzarfati mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-06 · CP RED · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-19 · WP-C YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shawn Winn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-16 · CP YELLOW · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Valerie Imperial
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-15 · CP YELLOW · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Sanderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-07-09 · CP YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Nordini
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-05 · WP-C ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eyal Tzarfati mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-14 · WP-C ORANGE · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eyal Tzarfati mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-11 · CP YELLOW · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with MacAyla Hansen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-04 · CP YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Sanderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-03 · CP YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lynn Kitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams61 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
55.9%
19W–15L · 54.8% of games
3.0
59.3%
70W–48L · 55.5% of games
3.5
29.6%
8W–19L · 44.9% of games
6.0
86.1%
31W–5L · 63.9% of games
7.0
31.2%
5W–11L · 45.3% of games
6.0mixed
70.3%
26W–11L · 58.6% of games
6.5mixed
47.8%
11W–12L · 49.8% of games
7.0mixed
41.2%
7W–10L · 47.7% of games
7.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
114 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
103 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
60 matches
#1 Female Singles
8%
26 matches
#1 Singles
5%
15 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams