← Search

Torey Kirkpatrick

Denver, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
115 matches · 64W–51L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Torey Kirkpatrick to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history115 matches
W
2026-09-03 · RCC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cindy Ronlov
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-06 · RCC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Elliott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-30 · RCC GREEN · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-28 · BRMST NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret Bender
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-23 · RCC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Crystal Higgins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-07-14 · BRMST NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carol Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-07-09 · RCC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Crystal Higgins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · BRMST NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carol Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-07-02 · RCC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Highley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-30 · BRMST NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-26 · BRMST BLUE · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Hamill mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-25 · RCC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Highley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
55.6%
60W–48L · 53.5% of games
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 53.2% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
56 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
16 matches
#1 Singles
11%
13 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer