← Search

Tonya Walker

— year-end
125 matches · 80W–45L · seasons 2022–2027

Captains: add Tonya Walker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history125 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Return To Sender · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin Barnhart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-09-02 · Return To Sender · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Harrison Elle Yarnell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-07-12 · Beauties and Beasts · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chad Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
Lawre Everest / Sarah Schmidt
2026-06-22 · Racquet Rebels · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alise Day
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-06-16 · Racquet Rebels · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alise Day
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-01 · Racquet Rebels · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anna Olson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-28 · Mid Court Crisis · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sunny Jerrim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-18 · Racquet Rebels · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alise Day
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-17 · Beauties and Beasts · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chad Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-11 · Racquet Rebels · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alise Day
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-30 · Mid Court Crisis · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Haven Willis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-23 · Mid Court Crisis · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Haven Willis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Teams27 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
58.8%
10W–7L · 55.1% of games
3.0
78.6%
11W–3L · 62.3% of games
3.5
57.4%
27W–20L · 52.3% of games
6.0
75%
9W–3L · 59.4% of games
7.0
65.7%
23W–12L · 56.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
59 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
14 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King