← Search

Beverly Swimm

ALBANY, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
230 matches · 127W–103L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Beverly Swimm to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history230 matches
L
2026-08-25 · 7.0W55 Raffa · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paula Doherty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-08-16 · #2 Doubles · with Hillary Cooley championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-15 · #3 Doubles · with Hillary Cooley championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-15 · #3 Doubles · with Michelle Bollacker championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-08-14 · #1 Doubles · with Annette Grajny championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Hillary Cooley championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-08-07 · #1 Doubles · with Shikha Raturi championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-08-04 · 7.0W55 Raffa · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Dygert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-22 · Northern: Tennis Crush · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shikha Raturi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-07-21 · 7.0W55 Raffa · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathleen Moran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-07-14 · 7.0W55 Raffa · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathleen Moran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-07-08 · Northern: Tennis Crush · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Bollacker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
4.0
88.9%
8W–1L · 59.6% of games
4.5
53.7%
22W–19L · 51.6% of games
5.0
0%
0W–4L · 22.6% of games
7.0
66.7%
8W–4L · 58.1% of games
8.0
84.4%
27W–5L · 62.6% of games
9.0
8.3%
1W–11L · 34.5% of games
7.0mixed
88.2%
15W–2L · 61.9% of games
8.0mixed
43.5%
10W–13L · 49.1% of games
9.0mixed
50%
16W–16L · 48.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
93 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
75 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
60 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal