← Search

Jessica Hindson

Gansevoort, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
73 matches · 51W–22L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jessica Hindson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history73 matches
L
2026-07-22 · Richter · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ericka Blackburn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-15 · Richter · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ericka Blackburn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-25 · Saratoga Aces · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Angela Case
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-06-17 · Richter · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Crowe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-11 · Saratoga Aces · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melanie Wishart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-21 · Saratoga Aces · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Crowe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-22 · Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Margaret Oppenheim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-03-07 · Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Hennessy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2025-11-22 · Elm Park Grinders 8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Adam Heller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-07-28 · Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin Crowe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-07-21 · Slice Girls · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-07-17 · Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ericka Blackburn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
100%
4W–0L · 65.7% of games
3.0
86.4%
19W–3L · 62.6% of games
3.5
78.6%
22W–6L · 62.7% of games
4.0
30%
3W–7L · 45.5% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 48% of the time
#2 Doubles
48%
35 matches
#1 Doubles
40%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
5 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal