← Search

Mark Beckdahl

— year-end
35 matches · 20W–15L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mark Beckdahl to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history35 matches
W
2026-06-03 · BCC-Bennington · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Brooks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-13 · BCC-Bennington · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Huston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2024-06-28 · BCC Hayden · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephen Hayden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-0
L
2024-03-24 · QRRC-Taylor · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Darius Sanders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2024-03-02 · QRRC-Taylor · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Fraker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2023-12-09 · QRRC Taylor · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Stoecklein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L
2023-11-05 · QRRC Taylor · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brooks Compton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2023-08-25 · BCC-Beckdahl · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stephen Hayden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
L
2023-06-30 · BCC-Hayden · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with John Peyton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
Jim Hogue / James Lewis
2023-06-17 · BCC-Beckdahl · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Greg Toman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2023-05-26 · BCC-Hayden · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephen Hayden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2023-05-20 · BCC-Beckdahl · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Greg Toman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
Teams14 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
57.9%
11W–8L · 52.2% of games
4.5
25%
1W–3L · 41.8% of games
7.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 60.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
40%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
3 matches
#2 Singles
6%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams