← Search

Sue van Etten

— year-end
49 matches · 13W–36L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sue van Etten to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history49 matches
L
2026-07-21 · A65 6.0W GR Croskey · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Janice Hall Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-16 · A55 6.0W GR Denissoff · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cathy Denissoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-07 · A65 6.0W GR Croskey · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Marlene Pisanelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-25 · A55 6.0W GR Denissoff · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Deborah Firtha
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-23 · A65 6.0W GR Croskey · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Marlene Pisanelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-11 · A55 6.0W GR Denissoff · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Patricia Croskey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-09 · A65 6.0W GR Croskey · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Janet Brunecz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-21 · A55 6.0W GR Denissoff · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Patricia Croskey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-19 · A65 6.0W GR Croskey · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Janet Brunecz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2025-07-19 · A55 6.0W GR Denissoff · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Linda Hultz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2025-07-14 · A55 6.0W GR Denissoff · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Linda Hultz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2025-06-23 · A55 6.0W GR Denissoff · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sue Labut
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
Teams12 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0
23.5%
8W–26L · 40.1% of games
7.0
41.7%
5W–7L · 45.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 47% of the time
#2 Doubles
47%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams