← Search

Esther Hong

New York, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
184 matches · 92W–92L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Esther Hong to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history184 matches
W
2026-08-16 · #4 Doubles · with Susan Lee championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-15 · #3 Doubles · with Meiko Boynton championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · with Susan Lee championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-04 · Brod/Montali · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Brod
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4
W
2026-05-04 · Brod/Montali · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jade Seguchi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-03-23 · Metro: Mink · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Uzo Aneke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-02-25 · Metro: Mink · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-01-17 · #3 Doubles · with Morgan McGuire championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-01-16 · #3 Doubles · with Melissa Brod championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-12-04 · Metro: Brod/Montali · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Brod
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-11-23 · Brod/Gonzalez · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Yann Gregoire mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-11-19 · Metro: Brod/Montali · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Sheng
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
60%
3W–2L · 50.5% of games
3.5
67.2%
39W–19L · 57.3% of games
4.0
36.8%
21W–36L · 42.7% of games
7.0mixed
69.2%
9W–4L · 55.7% of games
8.0mixed
44%
11W–14L · 46.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 41% of the time
#3 Doubles
41%
75 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
53 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
34 matches
#1 Singles
7%
12 matches
#2 Singles
4%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams