← Search

Pam Widener

New York, NY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
197 matches · 113W–84L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Pam Widener to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history197 matches
L
2026-08-27 · Cooper/Trujillo · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Yvonne Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-18 · Gould/Aney · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Zeigler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-16 · #3 Doubles · with Therese Stowell championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
Neerja Bhatnagar / Carol Ryan
2026-08-15 · #4 Doubles · with Elizabeth Gormley championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-15 · #3 Doubles · with Therese Stowell championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-14 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-08-14 · #4 Doubles · with Therese Stowell championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-08-12 · Gould/Aney · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Gormley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-08-02 · Gould/Aney · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Therese Stowell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-28 · Cooper/Trujillo · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Shaughnessy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-26 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
Isabelle Hong
2026-07-26 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 5-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
100%
4W–0L · 72.1% of games
3.5
57.1%
44W–33L · 53.7% of games
4.0
23.5%
4W–13L · 35.1% of games
7.0
66.7%
12W–6L · 56.8% of games
8.0
50%
2W–2L · 46.1% of games
7.0mixed
78.3%
18W–5L · 59.8% of games
8.0mixed
50%
9W–9L · 53.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 26% of the time
#2 Doubles
26%
52 matches
#1 Singles
20%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
40 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
37 matches
#2 Singles
12%
24 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams