← Search

Daniel Curley

Kansas City, MO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
51 matches · 22W–29L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Daniel Curley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history51 matches
L
2025-06-12 · Woodard, Avery · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Murakami
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-05-15 · Woodard, Avery · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with George Lopez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-05-08 · Woodard, Avery · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with George Lopez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2025-04-24 · Woodard, Avery · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with George Lopez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2023-05-25 · Kirsch, Scott · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shane Loya
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W
2023-05-18 · Kirsch, Scott · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Kirsch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2023-05-04 · Kirsch, Scott · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christopher Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2023-04-27 · Kirsch, Scott · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kris Chatrathi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2023-04-15 · Benschoter, Gib · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jim Weaver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2023-03-04 · Benschoter, Gib · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stan Chappell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2023-02-18 · Benschoter, Gib · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stan Chappell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2023-02-11 · Benschoter, Gib · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sam Cargnel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2020–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
4.0
43.1%
22W–29L · 48.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
13 matches
#2 Singles
4%
2 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova