← Search

Sara Gregerson

— year-end
103 matches · 53W–50L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sara Gregerson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history103 matches
L
2026-03-08 · STLWC/Basham-Simpson/18&Over4.5W · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Paula Douglass
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-01 · STLWC/Basham-Simpson/18&Over4.5W · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sara Runge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-10-12 · Basham/Simpson (F) · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Abbie Bradley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2025-09-14 · Basham/Simpson (F) · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Shepard Simpson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-2, 1-0
L
2024-08-11 · Gregerson · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rob Armstrong mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2024-06-09 · Gregerson · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rob Armstrong mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-2
W
2023-09-06 · Fry · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caitlin Winey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2023-08-15 · STL/Gregerson-Crawford/40&Over8.0MXD · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rob Armstrong mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2023-07-09 · STL/Gregerson-Crawford/40&Over8.0MXD · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rob Armstrong mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2023-07-09 · STL/Gregerson-Crawford/40&Over8.0MXD · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rob Armstrong mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-5, 1-0
L
2023-04-30 · Runge · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Shepard Simpson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L
2023-04-20 · Chiapelas/Moore · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Elizabeth Chiapelas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-5
Teams29 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
50%
5W–5L · 48% of games
4.0
90.3%
28W–3L · 60.9% of games
4.5
30%
9W–21L · 43.9% of games
9.0
16.7%
2W–10L · 45.3% of games
8.0mixed
47.1%
8W–9L · 49.1% of games
9.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
55 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
19 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal