← Search

David Weis

Ballwin, MO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
73 matches · 39W–34L · seasons 2020–2025

Captains: add David Weis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history73 matches
W
2025-05-04 · Yoder/Best (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thanaphat Chananukul
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-03-16 · Yoder/Best (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dan Luebbert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2025-02-23 · Yoder/Best (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Yoder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2025-02-02 · Yoder/Best (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bart Coleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2025-01-26 · Yoder/Best (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrew Lohr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2025-01-19 · Yoder/Best (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dan Luebbert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2024-11-10 · Yoder/Best (F) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dan Luebbert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2024-10-27 · Yoder/Best (F) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dan Luebbert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2024-10-07 · Yoder/Best (F) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Harjinder Singh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-10-02 · Wheeland and Dealin (Shouldis/Wheeland) · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Deb Weis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
W
2024-09-15 · Yoder/Best (F) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dan Luebbert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2024-08-29 · Wheeland and Dealin (Shouldis/Wheeland) · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Deb Weis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
51.6%
33W–31L · 50.6% of games
7.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 47.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
14 matches
#1 Singles
6%
4 matches
#2 Singles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams