← Search

David Yoder

Chesterfield, MO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
102 matches · 50W–52L · seasons 2020–2027

Captains: add David Yoder to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history102 matches
W
2026-09-13 · Yoder (F) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Fattah Habibollah
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-03 · Yoder (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vembakkam Sampath
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-04-19 · Yoder (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Best
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-04-12 · Yoder (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Best
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-03-29 · Yoder (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Best
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-2, 1-0
W
2026-03-08 · Yoder (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vembakkam Sampath
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-03-01 · Yoder (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Harjinder Singh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-15 · Yoder (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thomas Kennedy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-3, 0-1
L
2026-02-07 · Yoder (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vembakkam Sampath
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-4
L
2026-01-18 · Yoder (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vembakkam Sampath
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-01-04 · Yoder (F) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dan Luebbert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-12-14 · Yoder (F) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dan Luebbert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
48.3%
42W–45L · 50.7% of games
7.0mixed
53.3%
8W–7L · 49.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
35 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
18 matches
#1 Singles
5%
5 matches
#2 Singles
5%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer