← Search

Gloria Mullenix

Tulsa, OK
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
169 matches · 69W–100L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Gloria Mullenix to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history169 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Knox/LF/40&over3.5W · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mia Vahlberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-02 · Mullenix 55s 7.0X/LF · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeremy Brunk mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-07 · Mullenix 55s 7.0X/LF · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeremy Brunk mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-02 · Mullenix 55s 7.0X/LF · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ed Vestal mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-07-12 · Mullenix 55s 7.0X/LF · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Hayward mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-09 · 2. Duke 55s 7.0/LF · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mia Vahlberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-03 · Tulsa/Mullenix 65 7.0W/LF · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mia Vahlberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-02 · 2. Duke 55s 7.0/LF · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Vanessa Hutto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-04-26 · Tulsa/Mullenix 65 7.0W/LF · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mia Vahlberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
Jennifer Cook / Dana Peace
2026-03-28 · 2. Duke 55s 7.0/LF · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mia Vahlberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-03-22 · Tulsa/Mullenix 65 7.0W/LF · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karin Duke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-03-08 · Tulsa/Mullenix 65 7.0W/LF · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mia Vahlberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 54% of games
3.5
42.1%
8W–11L · 51.4% of games
4.0
30.8%
8W–18L · 42% of games
7.0
72.7%
16W–6L · 59.9% of games
8.0
18.9%
7W–30L · 39.3% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
46.4%
26W–30L · 47.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
62 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
58 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
46 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer