← Search

Kelly Wilhelm

— year-end
151 matches · 70W–81L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kelly Wilhelm to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history151 matches
L
2026-05-26 · Mapel/CR 3.0W · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Patricia Mapel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-05-11 · Mapel/CR 3.0W · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barb Drotar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-09 · Red 2: Sacra/LF 55s 6.0W · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Angie Ray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-05-02 · Red 2: Sacra/LF 55s 6.0W · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Angie Ray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-02 · Wilburn/LF 55s 7.0W · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Leonard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-20 · Mapel/CR 3.0W · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barb Drotar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-04-18 · Wilburn/LF 55s 7.0W · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia Stuart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-01 · Mapel/CR 3.0W · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barb Drotar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-03-28 · Red 2: Sacra/LF 55s 6.0W · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Angie Ray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-03-28 · Wilburn/LF 55s 7.0W · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Hargis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-23 · Mapel/CR 3.0W · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barb Drotar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-03-21 · Red 2: Sacra/LF 55s 6.0W · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Angie Ray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
Teams40 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
30.8%
4W–9L · 47% of games
3.0
62.1%
41W–25L · 54.2% of games
3.5
25%
8W–24L · 35.2% of games
6.0
83.3%
10W–2L · 63.6% of games
7.0
30%
6W–14L · 39% of games
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 36% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
66 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
32 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert