← Search

Erika Sabatos

Denver, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
171 matches · 109W–62L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Erika Sabatos to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history171 matches
W
2026-09-03 · SKY BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-24 · SKY BLUE · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-23 · SKY BLUE · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mark Sabatos mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-16 · SKY BLUE · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mark Sabatos mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-26 · SKY BLUE · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mark Sabatos mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-21 · SKY GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joy Kathleen Murphy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-19 · SKY BLUE · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mark Sabatos mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-07-16 · SKY GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joy Kathleen Murphy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-07-14 · SKY GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandra Schumm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-07-12 · SKY BLUE · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brian Hunter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-09 · SKY GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Camilla Almuti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-07 · SKY GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
81.5%
22W–5L · 65.4% of games
3.0
74.2%
46W–16L · 57.1% of games
3.5
51.6%
32W–30L · 50.4% of games
7.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 56.1% of games
5.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 44.8% of games
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 44.6% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
58 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
56 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
29 matches
#1 Singles
15%
25 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova