← Search

Eric Rogers

Plymouth, MA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
85 matches · 65W–20L · seasons 2021–2027

Captains: add Eric Rogers to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history85 matches
W
2026-09-11 · MIT:Marion:Mello · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelly Hudak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-30 · EB: Francoeur · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Belmore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-16 · EB: Francoeur · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Guilherme Serrano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-06 · LAK:Lakeville:Pereira/Dusseault · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Flaim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-06-22 · LAK:Lakeville:Pereira/Dusseault · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patrick Walker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-06-01 · LAK:Lakeville:Pereira/Dusseault · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kerry Zeida
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-05-11 · LAK:Lakeville:Pereira/Dusseault · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patrick Walker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-03-29 · LAK:Mid-Court Crisis:Kimball · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thea O Donnell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-03-27 · MIT:Marion:Mello/Nunes · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann Pasquill mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-20 · MCAC:Waldron:Campbell · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Elizabeth Campbell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-13 · MIT:Marion:Mello/Nunes · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann Pasquill mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-02-27 · MCAC:Waldron:Campbell · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Elizabeth Campbell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
70.6%
24W–10L · 55.6% of games
7.0mixed
83.3%
25W–5L · 60.2% of games
8.0mixed
83.3%
15W–3L · 62.2% of games
9.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
14 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert