← Search

Wes Marcks

— year-end
34 matches · 18W–16L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Wes Marcks to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history34 matches
L
2026-07-30 · RP: Paulino/Brazenor · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephen Bucknam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-27 · RP: Paulino/Brazenor · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Douglas Drainville
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 2-4
L
2026-07-20 · RP: Paulino/Brazenor · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Baalbaki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
Cesar Fernandes / Michael Murphy
2026-06-30 · RP: Paulino/Brazenor · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeremy Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-06-16 · RP: Paulino/Brazenor · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Baalbaki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 6-1
W
2026-06-13 · RP: Paulino/Brazenor · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paul Paulino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 3-1
W
2026-06-11 · RP: Paulino/Brazenor · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Racine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-03-22 · RP: Carney/Fontaine · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathryn Hall mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 5-7, 5-2
L
2026-01-24 · RP: Carney/Fontaine · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jyl Collins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 2-4, 0-1
W
2025-07-30 · RP: A Team/Paulino/Goodwin · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephen Bucknam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-07-18 · RP: B Fontaine/Racine · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jonathan Krasner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-07-16 · RP: A Team/Paulino/Goodwin · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Douglas Drainville
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
Teams8 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 53.1% of games
4.0
43.8%
7W–9L · 49.6% of games
7.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 52.6% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
18%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
5 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert