← Search

Debra Woods

Georgetown, TX
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
29 matches · 11W–18L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Debra Woods to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history29 matches
L
2026-03-29 · Simply Smashing · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sharon Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-03-15 · Simply Smashing · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carol Bigart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-03-01 · Simply Smashing · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carol Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-02-08 · Simply Smashing · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Fran Lefkowitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2025-02-06 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brenda Warrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-01-16 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L
2024-11-19 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brenda Warrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2024-11-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brenda Warrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2024-11-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2024-10-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Lippert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2024-09-26 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2024-05-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Giles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
36%
9W–16L · 46.2% of games
7.0
50%
2W–2L · 43.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 79% of the time
#3 Doubles
79%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert